Mohandas Gandhi? George Perry Graham? Louis Fischer? Henry Powell Spring? Martin Luther King?
Dear Quote Investigator: Mohandas Gandhi’s policy of non-violence was famously used during the campaign for independence in India. There is a well-known quotation that helps to express the rationale for this non-retaliatory philosophy:
An eye for an eye will leave everyone blind.
I have read that Gandhi spoke this statement or something similar, but I haven’t yet found a precise citation for this. Could you find out when and where Gandhi said this?
Quote Investigator: One of the world’s top quotation experts, Fred R. Shapiro editor of the Yale Book of Quotations (YBQ), has examined this question. This is what the YBQ says:1
“An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind” is frequently attributed to M. K. Gandhi. The Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence states that the Gandhi family believes it is an authentic Gandhi quotation, but no example of its use by the Indian leader has ever been discovered.
The YBQ notes that an important biographer of Gandhi, Louis Fischer, used a version of the expression when he wrote about Gandhi’s approach to conflict. However, Fischer did not attribute the saying to Gandhi in his description of the leader’s life. Instead, Fischer used the expression himself as part of his explanation of Gandhi’s philosophy. QI thinks some readers may have been confused and may have decided to directly attribute the saying to Gandhi based on a misreading of Fischer’s works.
The epigram is a twist on a famous Biblical injunction in the Book of Exodus [21:24]: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth. These words appear in the King James English translation. There is a more elaborate version of the clever maxim based on these two phrases:
An eye-for-eye and tooth-for-tooth would lead to a world of the blind and toothless.
QI has located relevant variants for this longer expression in 1914 and 1944. Below are selected citations in chronological order.
In 1914 politician and journalist George Perry Graham argued against the death penalty in the Canadian House of Parliament. He mentioned the well-known verse of Exodus and then employed it in a trope about the members of the Parliament:2
Mr. GRAHAM: We can argue all we like, but if capital punishment is being inflicted on some man, we are inclined to say: ‘It serves him right.’ That is not the spirit, I believe, in which legislation is enacted. If in this present age we were to go back to the old time of ‘an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,’ there would be very few hon. gentlemen in this House who would not, metaphorically speaking, be blind and toothless.
In 1944 a version of the maxim was used by Henry Powell Spring in his book of aphorisms, “What is Truth”. The acknowledgment section of the book indicated that Spring was a follower of Rudolf Steiner and Anthroposophy:3
The Spirit and Beings continue unselfishly to maintain life upon our planet, restoring us nightly, and forgiving us our wilful blindnesses far beyond our spiritual or bodily capacity of repayment. If the Spirit, Who is Life, exacted an eye for an eye, or a tooth for a tooth, this world would indeed be peopled with the blind and the toothless.
In 1947 the book “Gandhi and Stalin” by Louis Fischer was published. Fischer’s work contrasted these two archetypal figures, and it contained a version of the saying mentioning eyes (but not teeth) that is often attributed to Gandhi today. Fischer used the phrase while discussing Gandhi and his approach to conflict resolution, but he did not attribute the words to him. This is the earliest cite located by QI that connects Gandhi with the saying:4
The shreds of individuality cannot be sewed together with a bayonet; nor can democracy be restored according to the Biblical injunction of an “eye for an eye” which, in the end, would make everybody blind.
Any attempt to introduce democracy or to check totalitarianism must constantly emphasize the rehabilitation of personality. Freedom and responsibility help. Rigid authority hinders.
In 1950 an important early biography of Gandhi called “The Life of Mahatma Gandhi” by Louis Fischer was published. Fischer used the maxim again while explaining the concept of Satyagraha, but he did not attribute the words to Gandhi. This cite appears in the YBQ:5
Satyagraha is peaceful. If words fail to convince the adversary perhaps purity, humility, and honesty will. The opponent must be “weaned from error by patience and sympathy,” weaned, not crushed; converted, not annihilated.
Satyagraha is the exact opposite of the policy of an-eye-for-an-eye-for-an-eye-for-an-eye which ends in making everybody blind.
You cannot inject new ideas into a man’s head by chopping it off; neither will you infuse a new spirit into his heart by piercing it with a dagger.
In 1958 the major civil rights leader Martin Luther King who was influenced by Gandhian ideals used the aphorism in his book “Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story”:6
Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than to convert.
Ralph Keyes writing in the Quote Verifier mentioned the above citation.7 He also noted that the 1971 movie version of the popular musical “Fiddler in the Roof” contained the longer saying. This production appeared on Broadway in 1964 and is based on stories by Sholom Aleichem. Here is an instance of the saying in a script published in 1970:8
FIRST MAN: We should defend ourselves. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
TEVYE: Very good. And that way, the whole world will be blind and toothless.
In modern times the Oscar-winning 1982 biopic Gandhi helped to popularize the connection between Gandhi and the saying. The film depicted the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the ensuing violent riots. The following two lines were exchanged between a close political ally and Gandhi who was played by Ben Kingsley:9
01:43:20 – After what they did at the massacre? It’s only an eye for an eye.
01:43:24 – An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.
In conclusion, Mahatma Gandhi may have used the expression, but no conclusive evidence for this has yet been discovered. It is also possible that the ascription is inaccurate and the books of Louis Fischer may have inadvertently helped to establish the attribution. A more extravagant version of the adage with the words “blind and toothless” was used by 1914 by George Perry Graham.
Update history: On February 25, 2012 the citation for the 1982 Gandhi movie was added. On April 11, 2021 the name “Mr. Graham” was updated to indicate that he speaker was politician and journalist George Perry Graham.
- 2006, The Yale Book of Quotations by Fred R. Shapiro, Page 269-270, Yale University Press, New Haven. (Verified on paper) ↩︎
- 1914 February 5, Official Report of the Debates of the House of Commons of the Dominion of Canada: Third Session – Twelfth Parliament, Mr. Graham speaking (George Perry Graham), Page 496, Volume CXIII, Printed by J. De L. Tache, Printer to the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, Ottawa. (HathiTrust full view) link ↩︎
- 1944, “What is Truth” by (Henry) Powell Spring, Page 10, The Orange Press, Winter Park, Florida. (Google Books snippet; Verified on paper) link ↩︎
- 1947, Gandhi and Stalin by Louis Fischer, Page 61, Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York. (Google Books snippet; Verified on paper) link ↩︎
- 1950, The Life of Mahatma Gandhi by Louis Fischer, Chapter 11: Gandhi Goes to Jail, Page 77, Harper & Row, New York. (Verified on paper) link ↩︎
- 1958, “Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story” by Martin Luther King, Jr., Page 213, Harper & Row, New York. (Google snippet; Verified on paper) link ↩︎
- 2006, The Quote Verifier by Ralph Keyes, Page 74-75, St Martin’s Griffin, New York. (Verified on paper) ↩︎
- 1970, “Best Plays of the Sixties” edited by Stanley Richards, Fiddler on the Roof, Page 322, Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New York. (Verified on paper) ↩︎
- 1982, Gandhi film, Directed by Richard Attenborough, Screenplay by John Briley, Ben Kingsley in the role of Gandhi, Production: National Film Development Corporation of India (NFDC) and Goldcrest Films International. (Movie clip with dialog viewed at wingclips.com on February 25, 2012; Data from Internet Movie Database) link link ↩︎
Thank you so much for this iformatio. I thought it came from Exodus initially and grew from there. I am being asked my opinion on what justice means to me I wanted to use the famous quote but was not sure who to give credit to. Great ad very thorough information! Thank you.
Sincerely,
Joan Matuszczak
Criminal Justice Student
Hmmm…I was investigating this quote, as it is a good one to use today, 9-21-2011, World Peace Day/International Peace Day. Also, very ironic, that today is another execution for the State of Texas, right here in Huntsville, Texas, right down the street a few blocks from the University (SHSU) where I work, and that Martin Luther King III is present today with other peaceful protesters, outside the Wall Unit, along with Ross Byrd, the son of Rodney Bird, the man killed by Lawrence Brewer, who is being executed today. Enough said…think about it!
The original eye for an eye was meant as a foundation for a national system of justice not for personal, individual application. I find it hard to understand that people don’t get this.
I guess extreme pacifists who find this concept of justice wicked want all prisoners to be freed no matter their offense. You’ve raped and murdered my little girl? Oh, punishment will do nothing but bring us all down, I love you and forgive you please don’t do it again here’s a candy bar for you! This is not justice, and this one is responsible for any further evils done by that one. Forgive them from the heart, pray for them, do good to them, but don’t make meaningless the law by allowing the evil to go unpunished and usher in anarchy. It’s naive and dangerous to think a nation can follow this path.
We should, in personal matters, turn the other cheek as Jesus said, but he also said (via Paul) “For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. For he is God’s servant to do you good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God’s servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.”
and also
‘The LORD is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but he will by no means clear the guilty’
Perhaps I should comment about the selection of quotations for this website.
When a quotation is examined it does not indicate that I condone the saying. Nor does it indicate that I condemn the saying. Intriguing quotations often can be described with one or more of the following adjectives: fun, interesting, entertaining, insightful, clever, influential, inflammatory, wrong-headed, egregious, reprehensible, truthful, and important.
It is foolish to stretch Gandhi’s philosophy to say that he, or anyone adhering to similar beliefs, believes that criminals should go unpunished. It is not any man’s right to kill another, even when that person has committed a great atrocity. Having a criminal’s freedom restrained is an entirely different matter, as long as the law under which he is convicted is just. As Gandhi says, unjust laws are a species of violence, and it is our duty to protest them.
@Josh Caviness: Thank you!